|
"To find God one must first leave the Church," is a thought that occurred to me years ago, long before I had any formal contact with Unitarianism. By this I did not necessarily mean the Roman Catholic Church. Unitarianism might be a much better attempt at a genuinely Universal (= catholic), but not necessarily Universalist, church, a church to which all humanity does, in actual fact, already belong. What I meant was to leave the very concept of church in order to find oneself, naked in a sense, except for ones humanity. But a human inhabits a pre-given world. And religiosity is a fact of the human condition. And this religiosity is an outcrop of an aspect of human nature. Humans, or some at least, experience God; we have experiences which many describe using God-terminology. We speak of such experiences and occurrences. We write about them and depict them in many other ways. A service in a church or temple, synagogue or mosque, involves speaking of such things and demonstrating them in a variety of other ways.
"Self and Godhead are One," say the Hindus. The essence of human religiosity is hidden behind layers of social constructs wherever it is celebrated. The Christian 16th century Reformation was an attempt to find the true essence of Christianity by stripping it down to what the Reformers believed was its basics; that is, the Word of God expressed in the Bible. Some say, a little glibly perhaps, that the Reformation simply rearranged the seating in European churches. The source of human interaction with God is the direct human experience of God; books simply speak of this even if eloquently, honestly and accurately. Distinctions such as 'high church' and 'low church' are really unimportant. These refer only to superficial aspects of the 'clothing' which shroud the interface between God and humankind. People are not necessarily closer to God in worship settings that are austere and stark. They are, of course, certainly not farther from God in such surroundings. The individual who feels closer to God within the context of a 'high church' element of whatever world religious movement he might use to approach God feels this more for reasons of cultural preference and conditioning rather than because God speaks more eloquently in such settings. When God touches an individual it takes the form of an experience of an ineffable nature. Different societies may seek to capture this in a variety of ways. The clothing may be ornate or simple but either way the clothing should be recognised for what it is. It is not the thing itself. When the Temple of Solomon was destroyed by the Romans in 70AD the Roman general entered the Holy of Holies at the heart of the Temple. This was where Yahweh was said to live. The Roman found an empty space. Not a copy of the Torah whether plainly written or otherwise. Not an ornate Arc of the Covenant; just empty space. Yet this space housed that which is Most Holy. The Most Holy is depicted by nothingness, by the absence of depiction of any sort. It is the ineffable, the indescribable, the nothing that is the source of all, that which is impossible to articulate, to utter.
Brendan Burke MA(Phil) |